U.S. desk · Proprietary instrument

U.S. Latino Radar

The races where Latino electoral weight, competitiveness and control of Congress intersect.

The index combines seven signals without reallocating weights. It is not a battleground-only list: a safe seat can matter through its electorate, representation or role in control of Congress.

Updated · 2026-09-16 · 2020-2024 ACS 5-year

House207

races · average index 18.6

Senate7

races · average index 30.4

2028 President2028

Preliminary signal · no Vote-Scope projection

National index

Latino Vote Index

The two-party Democratic share of the Latino House vote, aggregated from all-Latino polls and published with its own precision.

Two-party Democratic share 65.1%

95% confidence interval: 62.2% – 68.0% Two-party margin D+30.2

What this index cannot do yet

Three usable waves, 2 houses, and the most recent fieldwork is 125 days old. The effective sample behind the number is 1025 respondents once the recency discount is applied. This is an average in the arithmetic sense, not yet in the statistical one.

The two houses in the series sit 5.2 points apart on the headline metric. With this few houses, the LEVEL of the index partly reflects who fielded most recently: do not read a change of house as a movement of opinion.

We draw no trend line: three points from two houses would describe the gap between the houses, not the electorate.

Why the two-party share?

Houses handle undecideds differently: in May 2026 UnidosUS and Equis both put the Democrat at 54 but the Republican at 27 and 35. The two-party share D/(D+R) is the only form comparable across houses.

Three tracks, never mixed

Why they stay apart

U.S. pollsters field at least two populations — adults and registered voters — and switch from a generic to a named ballot as the election nears. Both are valid; they are not the same measurement. Measured on our own data: 66.1% on an adults/generic wave ending 31 August, 56.3% on a registered-voter/named wave ending 8 September, same house, eight days apart. The index therefore keeps separate tracks and never averages across them.

Track Population Ballot Two-party Waves Field Movement within track
Dedicated Latino polls Headline track Registered voters Generic 65.1% 3 125 d ago +1.7 over 204 d
General-poll crosstabs Registered voters Named 60.7% 2 2 d ago Fewer than three waves
General-poll crosstabs Adults Generic 62.7% 6 16 d ago +2.1 over 217 d

The waves behind the index

Each wave is compared against the national generic-ballot average over the SAME field window, never against the average on publication day.

House Field Sample Published D / R Two-party Gap
Equis Research May 11, 2026 – May 25, 2026 2,000 ±2.0 Margin only — kept out of the share index
BSP Research & Shaw & Company Research UnidosUS Apr 27, 2026 – May 14, 2026 3,000 ±1.8 54 / 27 66.7% +14.5
Equis Research Mar 10, 2026 – Mar 20, 2026 2,000 ±2.0 54 / 35 60.7% +8.7
Equis Research Oct 15, 2025 – Oct 29, 2025 2,000 No ballot published
BSP Research & Shaw & Company Research UnidosUS Oct 8, 2025 – Oct 22, 2025 3,000 52 / 28 65.0% +13.6

Race

214 eligible races. Rankings recalculate after every new House or Senate model run.

RankRaceWhy it mattersProjection7-day moveIndex
#1TexasSenateLatino electorate · CompetitivenessDem. 66%+20.357.6/100#2CA-22HouseLatino electorate · Flip probabilityDem. 100%+0.553.3/100#3CA-52HouseLatino electorate · Flip probabilityDem. 100%0.053.0/100#4TX-34HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 88%+54.752.9/100#5TX-35HouseLatino electorate · CompetitivenessRep. 67%-29.647.9/100#6TX-28HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 98%+26.047.4/100#7New MexicoSenateLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 99%+1.947.3/100#8TX-23HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationRep. 88%-11.346.1/100#9FL-22HouseCompetitiveness · Flip probabilityDem. 68%+59.044.4/100#10FL-27HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationRep. 96%-4.043.1/100#11CO-8HouseLatino electorate · Flip probabilityDem. 100%+1.942.6/100#12AZ-2HouseCompetitiveness · Recent movementRep. 57%-38.841.9/100#13TX-15HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationRep. 96%-3.640.9/100#14AZ-6HouseFlip probability · Candidate representationDem. 100%+5.440.0/100#15NM-2HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.7/100#16FL-14HouseFlip probability · Recent movementDem. 94%+41.738.7/100#17CA-21HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.0/100#18CA-25HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.0/100#19CA-29HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.0/100#20CA-33HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.0/100#21CA-34HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.0/100#22CA-35HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.0/100#23CA-42HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.0/100#24CA-44HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.0/100#25CA-46HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.038.0/100#26CO-3HouseFlip probability · Recent movementDem. 98%+45.537.5/100#27FL-7HouseCompetitiveness · Recent movementRep. 70%-26.437.2/100#28NY-15HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.036.8/100#29TX-16HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.036.5/100#30TX-20HouseLatino electorate · Candidate representationDem. 100%0.036.5/100

30 / 214

Methodology

Each component is scored from 0 to 100 and multiplied by its published weight. Incomplete races are excluded, never reweighted.

20%Latino electorate
20%Competitiveness
15%Flip probability
15%Candidate representation
10%Control importance
10%Recent movement
10%Likely mobilization